{"id":296,"date":"2005-11-28T20:48:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-29T03:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ourthoughts.ca\/?p=296"},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T07:00:00","slug":"nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ourthoughts.ca\/2005\/11\/28\/nature\/","title":{"rendered":"Nature"},"content":{"rendered":"
Yesterday in our elders quorum meeting, the instructor brought up a point regarding how some individuals consider themselves having been born with certain qualities that they see no use in controlling. Specifically, he mentioned homosexuality. He disagreed with this idea on the basis that we are not born with such tendencies, but rather have a choice.<\/p>\n
I disagree. At least to the point that I see no problem with the idea that people can be born with qualities or tendencies that are in direct opposition (or at least seem to be) principles of Christianity. After all, “the natural man is an enemy to God”. As such, it doesn’t not seem preposterous that we are naturally sinful. I have known a lot of people, for example, who seem predisposed to being selfish or dishonest.<\/p>\n
If anything, it makes more sense. What would be the point of trying to be like Jesus if we were naturally inclined to be spiritual? What sacrifice would there be? How could we become stronger?<\/p>\n
Yesterday in our elders quorum meeting, the instructor brought up a point regarding how some individuals consider themselves having been … Continue reading Nature<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n