{"id":1645,"date":"2008-11-07T10:54:30","date_gmt":"2008-11-07T17:54:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ourthoughts.ca\/?p=1645"},"modified":"2008-11-07T10:54:30","modified_gmt":"2008-11-07T17:54:30","slug":"can-prophets-be-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ourthoughts.ca\/2008\/11\/07\/can-prophets-be-wrong\/","title":{"rendered":"Can prophets be wrong?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Or, more specifically, can they be wrong without being considered false prophets.<\/p>\n
For example, I don’t agree with the practise of cutting intermediate hymns short during General Conference because speakers took up more than their alloted times. Not only do I not agree with it, I think it’s wrong. Does that mean I think they fail as prophets, that they are false prophets?<\/p>\n
I don’t think so.<\/p>\n
Arguably, my example is an administrative issue, and has nothing to do with a prophet’s prophet-ness. But perhaps there are issues that have everything to do with it.<\/p>\n
I am sure many could come up with a quote or two from earlier church leaders that seem anomalistic to current Church dogma. Do one or two (or even a handful of) quotes that seem wrong mean their owners are false prophets? Do such few quotes negate dozens or hundreds of accurate quotes?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Or, more specifically, can they be wrong without being considered false prophets. For example, I don’t agree with the practise … Continue reading Can prophets be wrong?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n