Comments on: Facebook memes and sexism https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:18:54 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-218259 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:18:54 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-218259 In reply to Cynthia.

That’s kind of my point. These aren’t things we should kid around with.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216403 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:48:16 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216403 In reply to Russel.G.

So, what are the attributes of a prince then that they supposedly want (assuming that is the case since there are no character traits mentioned in the image at all)?

]]>
By: Russel.G https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216402 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:43:32 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216402 In reply to Kim Siever.

Or, another way of looking at it is that the princely attributes sought after by the young women who like this phrase are not wealth and power in a worldly sense. With the temple as the focus of their marital aspirations, as indicated by the focus on the temple in the photo, they are looking for young men who recognize they are sons of the Heavenly King, and who honor that identity and act accordingly. It’s easier to see this meaning than the so-called “sexist” meaning, for me anyway.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216401 Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:34:17 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216401 Here is another post on one of the memes:

http://www.dovesandserpents.org/wp/2011/10/rotten-to-the-core/

]]>
By: Cynthia https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216398 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:31:41 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216398 Dude, they are kidding around.
Trust me, nice people always treat each other equally. And the ones who don’t, it will come biting them someday!

]]>
By: Ayesha https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216397 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:17:27 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216397 I just adore these memes on Facebook! I just enjoy them and sometimes gets touched by them.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216388 Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:51:18 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216388 In reply to jks.

Unfortunately, “prince” connotes wealth and (at least political) power.

]]>
By: jks https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216387 Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:25:42 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216387 I object the least to the temple pic. The rest are too sexist for me. The temple one isn’t too bad since it has some positives connotations to it (the priority in a spouse isn’t about wealth or power, but about values and character).

]]>
By: el oso https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2011/10/26/facebook-memes-and-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-216386 Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:09:55 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=2625#comment-216386 The first two, I did not find so bad. Maybe because locking a grown person in the trunk of a car is so ridiculous to me, unless they want to get in. It is like a cliched gangster trick. We also have small children and constantly stress not getting in anywhere you can get locked inside.
The second one can be construed as allusion straight from scripture. It is not how most adults would phrase it, but youth would like it. Of course, there are plenty of scriptures that are sexist in today’s view.

]]>