Comments on: Widening 6 Av S in Lethbridge https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Mon, 21 Sep 2015 03:56:50 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/comment-page-1/#comment-91208 Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:05:04 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=1661#comment-91208 I should clarify that the city isn’t seriously consider widening 6 Av. At this point, it is simply a discussion point for the scenario of not building a bridge.

I wholeheartedly agree that they should simply build the bridge in the original location. So did the transportation department when they made such a recommendation to council in the spring.

]]>
By: JM https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/comment-page-1/#comment-91203 Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:48:12 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=1661#comment-91203 The third river crossing has been planned by the city for decades now.

I remember reviewing a number of plans and drawings for it back when I worked at city hall. They’d make everyones life in Lethbridge easier if they’d just pull the trigger on that project and get it going.

Sure would make going to Home Depot easier if you lived in Riverstone.

Widening 6th Ave, again, is just stupid. Given the collevtive intelligence in the infrastructure department and city council, it sounds like stupid is the only thing on the menu lately…

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/comment-page-1/#comment-90918 Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:13:52 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=1661#comment-90918 Yeah, that bridge to the Northside suggestion was a joke. Not only are there no houses that far north on the Westside, the City doesn’t own any land north of Crowsnest Trail.

]]>
By: Jon W. https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/comment-page-1/#comment-90917 Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:01:37 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=1661#comment-90917 Kim,

I know they did, that is why I am peeved. Like the suggestion that they build the bridge to the North side, there is no houses that far north on the west side so what is the point?

Personally a bridge that goes from the far south part of Scenic to the West side. I think it makes sense to relieve the traffic flow.

But then I live in Edmonton where everything appears to be under construction at the moment.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/comment-page-1/#comment-90898 Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:09:57 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=1661#comment-90898 Jon W,

That was the plan, but the City caved to all the complaining from Tudor residents about the proposed location, so they asked administration to come back with information on three scenarios.

Dawn,

A freeway is a high-speed roadway with no at-grade intersections. Whoop-Up qualifies between 4 St S and McMaster Blvd W; although it may be the world’s shortest freeway. :)

]]>
By: Dawn https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/comment-page-1/#comment-90895 Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:57:59 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=1661#comment-90895 I’m not sure freeway should be in a sentence with Whoop-Up Drive. :0)Can Whoop-Up Drive really be defined as a freeway?? LOL

]]>
By: Jon W. https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/11/14/widening-6-av-s-in-lethbridge/comment-page-1/#comment-90886 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:27:07 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=1661#comment-90886 Just put the bridge on the south side for pete sake. Yikes, so dumb. For a city that taxes businesses as much as Lethbridge does I cannot believe how little they do.

]]>