Comments on: Albertans have spoken https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:19:25 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-45121 Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:19:25 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-45121 He’s not new. He was the previous premier, but this is the first time he’s been elected in by Albertans.

]]>
By: Sally https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-45120 Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:13:01 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-45120 not knowing who’s who in the Alberta political system I can’t make out if this new Premier was a good thing or bad thing?

]]>
By: Jon W. https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44975 Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:22:33 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44975 The problem is there was no one else dynamic enough to take people away from a safe Eddie.

People do view the Tories as a part of Alberta and even those who dislike them said to themselves on Monday, “Aw they will win anyways.”

The reality is no one knows because the vote total was atrocious. The hard fact is unless you install an Australian style of mandidatory voting people in good times just do not care about politics.

As two different political people from different sides of the fence told me.

“You cannot kill Santa Claus.”

“If I have a job, an SUV/Truck parked in my garage and I am not suffering any real set back why would I care?”

The reality is Kevin Taft was too eggheaded and was not going to connect with people in Alberta that like their leaders a little down home.

The only way anyone is going to take the Tories out is to have a Charismatic leader, be just about the same in policy and have coalessed the majority of the opposition behind them.

The Liberals could do that as long as they change their name and get a leader who is like Lawrence Decore or Peter Lougheed, dynamic, fresh but safe.

]]>
By: Nikki https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44939 Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:27:29 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44939 Truly the most over-used and uninspired response he could have made. As if I needed to be reminded about how very ordinary Ed is.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44837 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:28:51 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44837 If we don’t let production keep growing? Sure. If we let it keep growing? That depends.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44836 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:23:47 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44836 s not going to be there forever."</p> <p>I don't know about that Kim, I was told yesterday by an evangelical Christian that the Rapture is due soon - within the next 50 years, he claims.</p> <p>Think we have 50 years worth of oil in that sand?</p> ]]> “The oil’s not going to be there forever.”

I don’t know about that Kim, I was told yesterday by an evangelical Christian that the Rapture is due soon – within the next 50 years, he claims.

Think we have 50 years worth of oil in that sand?

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44835 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:11:50 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44835 No. Job stability isn’t the only issue important to me. My narrow-focused comment was in response to yours. :)

I don’t think job stability should come at a cost of housing and infrastructure, for example. I certainly don’t think a government should focus on job stability in only one sector.

Many of the problems plaguing Alberta today are a direct result of uncontrolled growth in the oil sands driven by greed to fill provincial coffers. Had the growth been controlled so it was sustainable, we’d have fewer housing issues, fewer commercial space issues in Calgary, fewer infrastructure issues, and less of a worker shortage. We’d also have more long-term funding from royalties, and we would have been able to focus on diversifying the economy. The oil’s not going to be there forever.

]]>
By: JM https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44831 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:23:09 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44831 So Kim,

If your employment was in an industry where the current government meant more job stability instead of less, would you have a different outlook?

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44830 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:09:28 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44830 Re #5

Then I’d have to triple my $500 mortgage payment and increase my 10-minute commute. :)

Re: 6

That’s the problem. It isn’t just about the seats. Sure they won 10 or so more seats. But the number of seats is irrelevant to voter opinion. They won those seats because the other half who voted couldn’t agree on who to pick as an alternative.

It’d be interesting to see what the results would have been if we had an MMP system.

]]>
By: Dawn https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/comment-page-1/#comment-44824 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:04:32 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2008/03/04/albertans-have-spoken/#comment-44824 Well, looking at the seats, I’d call it a landslide.

Progressive Conservative 72 seats
Liberal 9 seats
New Democratic Party 2 seats
Wildrose Alliance 0 seats

I was sorry the Wildrose Alliance didn’t make a little more headway.

As for your job – I suppose that’s how people usually look at politics – what is best for me, not for the good of the whole. That being said, is U of L cutting back? I thought school’s funding was being increased.

]]>