Comments on: 2007 Conservative Tax Plan https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:23:04 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34925 Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:23:04 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34925 That’s just it. Their projects will always be considered more important because more people use them.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34913 Sat, 10 Nov 2007 04:07:12 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34913 Only if that project is more important, and if it’s more important it should probably be done first anyway.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34904 Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:44:34 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34904 But then the larger centres will always get the funding because more people will use their projects.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34900 Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:55:17 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34900 When it comes to municipal projects, I prefer to see project based funding i.e. Money for THAT bridge, or THIS overpass.

When we get ratio based funding the smaller centres usually end up applying ‘patches’ rather than replacements; and we are in need of many a replacement in Southern Alberta.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34895 Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:03:36 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34895 I don’t think it’s off-topic at all. I would love to see that increased as well, but I would hope such an increase would be percentage-based so mid-sized cities (Regina, Kamloops, Lethbridge, Brandon, Sudbury, etc) aren’t screwed.

]]>
By: Malkie https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34893 Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:33:43 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34893 I’d rather have seen some of the money go towards municipal infrastructure projects – but perhaps that’s completely off topic.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34692 Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:44:35 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34692 Yup

]]>
By: Jeff Milner https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34687 Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:35:09 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34687 Will the decrease in GST mean a decrease in how much we get in GST rebate cheques?

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34594 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:38:39 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34594

What was the personal exemption rate at before the changes were announced?

$8,929. Keep in mind, however, that prior to the Tories taking power, the exemption rate was around 9,300. So the $700 increase is really an increase of just $300, less than the $500 increase the Liberals implemented before losing power.

if they keep it up, maybe it will eventually go away

They won’t keep it up anytime soon. Harper’s campaign promise was for 2 percent over 2 years. He has no plans for any further GST cuts. Even so, it’s a terrible source of tax cutting. Close to 3/4 of my net income goes to goods and services not taxed with GST.

GST tax cuts require people to purchase goods and services taxed by GST if they want to benefit from it. Income tax cuts on the other hand put money into the hands of all employed persons in the country before they even receive their paycheques. That’s the way to put money in the back pockets of Canadians.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-34589 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:11:24 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/10/31/2007-conservative-tax-plan/#comment-34589 I would have liked to have seen a greater increase in the personal exemption base amount. That number directly impacts the people in our society that need the most help.

The GST is a wash for me – until the whole thing is done away with, it continues to be pointless to discuss decreases in it. The majority of downside, from my point of view, is the immense amount of extra man-hours put into dealing with, adjudication of, and enforcement of the GST. Make it go away, and you’ll have my attention.

I too agree with Kim in the opinion that targeted tax cuts would stimulate particular businesses and a flat rate reduction is less than optimal. I hate to think that someone like Barbardier is receiving the same tax cut as some business who really needs it.

Overall, I felt like the speech was in the right direction although I didn’t necessarily agree with every choice made. I’m sure many felt the same way.

]]>