Comments on: Church Essentials https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Mon, 26 May 2008 07:16:16 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-54942 Mon, 26 May 2008 07:16:16 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-54942 I don’t think that undoes the possibility that Adam dwelt in a place called Adam-ondi-Ahman, and that the location in Missouri is a second or new Adam-ondi-Ahman—just like Jesus preached in a place called Jerusalem and a place prophesied to be built in North America will be a New Jerusalem.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-54649 Sat, 24 May 2008 05:08:41 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-54649 Orson Pratt supposedly interpreted the name to mean “Valley of God, where Adam dwelt”. (Journal of Discourses, 18:343)

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-54648 Sat, 24 May 2008 05:03:07 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-54648 Follow-up on comment 17: I was reading the same scripture the other day and realized that it never says Adam-Ondi-Ahman (a.k.a. Spring Hill) is the place where Adam appeared anciently; it only says it’s where Adam will appear at a future time.

So maybe it’s like the New Jerusalem, rather than the old. Or like the Cumorah where Joseph received the plates, rather than the one (different, in my personal view) from which Mormon retrieved them.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-28723 Fri, 18 May 2007 14:15:17 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-28723 ltbugaf

I know. I was just thinking of the Primary song.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-28708 Fri, 18 May 2007 05:18:31 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-28708 Mary, I truly do appreciate what you’ve said in comment 53. However, I do think there’s a difference between saying “God himself was once as we are now” and saying that Jesus was once a child, or a mortal.

The difference lies in the ways Jesus was different from others during his mortal life. If the New Testament is accurate, he totally abstained from eating and drinking for 40 days, which no ordinary person can do. Likewise, he had to choose to die—to yield up his spirit voluntarily, according to the teachings of many Prophets. So while he was mortal in the sense of being able to die, he was more than merely mortal in some other ways.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-28707 Fri, 18 May 2007 05:14:19 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-28707 The earliest I remember talking about becoming just like our Father in Heaven was around Discussion 5 or 6. Doesn’t matter.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-28706 Fri, 18 May 2007 05:02:45 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-28706 Yes, Jeff, but that really wasn’t the part I was talking about. In any case, you already have my concession.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-28700 Fri, 18 May 2007 03:32:29 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-28700 That’s a primary song

“Jesus once was a little child, a little child like me..”

]]>
By: Jeff Milner https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-28682 Thu, 17 May 2007 21:10:19 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-28682 I guess the first discussion memory I have isn’t so much about the pre-Godhood life of God so much as teaching that God is our father and as such we can become Gods like him—only implying, admittedly very weakly, that God was once a child like us.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/comment-page-2/#comment-28668 Thu, 17 May 2007 15:54:08 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/05/07/church-essentials/#comment-28668 You didn’t. Jeff Milner did. I was answering him.

]]>