Comments on: Tit for Tat https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:11:56 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jimmy Bryant https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-121195 Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:11:56 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-121195 Thanks so much for this dude! I’m definitely going to think about this and I only have one question… What in the world is going on in people’s heads nowadays?

]]> By: Chad Too https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21839 Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:46:37 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21839 Sam,

I am certainly not an Atheist. I’m about as believeing a Mormon as they come. I am offended by the phrase “under God” in the Pledge.

I don’t think your theory holds any water.

]]> By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21619 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:23:47 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21619 t quite comprehend that particular correlation." Nor do I ... I blame the US government. "It sure would cut down on one night stands." Or triple the sales of morning after pills. "I can’t wait for 10 years to pass to see if Canada is destroyed for legalizing same-sex marriage and US isn’t for denying it" Nor can I. I'd be impressed if either of our countries is 'destroyed' in only ten years. ltbugaf, gut|mind|ter :P]]> “Don’t quite comprehend that particular correlation.”

Nor do I … I blame the US government.

“It sure would cut down on one night stands.”

Or triple the sales of morning after pills.

“I can’t wait for 10 years to pass to see if Canada is destroyed for legalizing same-sex marriage and US isn’t for denying it”

Nor can I. I’d be impressed if either of our countries is ‘destroyed’ in only ten years.

ltbugaf, gut|mind|ter :P

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21618 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:09:37 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21618 There’s something I don’t like about the title of this thread in the context of lesbians marrying…

]]> By: George https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21596 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:59:41 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21596 Have you factored in the upcoming war with Iran?

mere said: What if you had a kid with someone you automatically were married.

It sure would cut down on one night stands.

]]> By: mere https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21590 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 03:53:59 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21590 What if you had a kid with someone you automatically were married.

And I can tell you, if they are talking about same sex marriage to divert people from the war in Iraq, its not working, I hear more about Iraq than anything.

I can’t wait for 10 years to pass to see if Canada is destroyed for legalizing same-sex marriage and US isn’t for denying it- my bet? It will be the other way around and the democrats would gloat except that it won’t matter since the whole world will be sinking due to global warming.

]]> By: Sam https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21585 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:59:58 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21585 s why it matters so much.” Call me daft, Jeff, but I’m not sure I follow you.]]> “Because this law would never pass, those interested in making marriage available to partners in same sex relationships make their point.
That’s why it matters so much.”

Call me daft, Jeff, but I’m not sure I follow you.

]]> By: Sam https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21582 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:55:43 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21582 s a diversionary tactic to keep people from thinking about Iraq…” Don’t quite comprehend that particular correlation.]]> “I have no idea why some of America is so fixated on eliminating same-sex marriage. I secretly suspect that it’s a diversionary tactic to keep people from thinking about Iraq…”

Don’t quite comprehend that particular correlation.

]]> By: Sally https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21525 Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:38:07 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21525 I don’t get the joke George. I didn’t even post a message on this thread.. what am I missing?

]]> By: Jeff Milner https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/comment-page-1/#comment-21513 Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:25:29 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2007/02/06/tit-for-tat/#comment-21513 “I have the same feelings about same-sex marriage in America. Why do you think it matters so much?”

Sort of reiterating what Rick said: if the marriage issue doesn’t matter than this law could and should be passed.

Because this law would never pass, those interested in making marrage available to partners in same sex relationships make their point.

That’s why it matters so much.

]]>