Comments on: Womanhood, priesthood and manhood https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-21939 Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:08:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-21939 ltbugaf,

Consider it noted. And acted upon. Sort of.

]]> By: George https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16316 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 12:13:31 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16316 I also forgive you Mary for the things you have written.

I am looking forward to not reading jabs. Thank you if you mean it.

]]> By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16305 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 02:36:04 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16305 ltbugaf

I have decided the same thing, a few days ago (to ignore him). And for the record, I have noticed you are much nicer since coming back :).

]]> By: George https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16301 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 01:32:42 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16301 Kim gave you your own thread. Maybe you should consider attacking me on the ltbugaf thread, then no one else would have to read it.

I still forgive you for the things you continue to write.

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16299 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 01:26:24 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16299 One more thing, Kim: I am not a big fan of banning people from a blog. But there’s a point where someone’s dishonesty and disruption are no longer tolerable and stand in the way of all reasonable discourse. I just think you should consider that.

]]> By: George https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16297 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 01:17:30 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16297 Sorry I did not have time to finish. The wife wanted to go shopping.

ltbugaf said: “Please show some slight shred of decency by ending your use of “nicknames” such as “schoolboy.””

I suppose you expect a double standard since you continue to call me Bill/George. You also go to great lengths to call me names. Schoolboy is pretty tame compared to the things you write and even more so since you claim to be a HP.

Ever since you came back from hidding, you have tried your best to insult me. You really come across as a faithful follower of Christ.

I forgive you.

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16296 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:28:49 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16296 …and I can only recommend, in the very strongest terms, that everyone else follow the same policy. I think it’s the only way to save the ‘blog from ruin.

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16295 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:27:42 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16295 TO ALL: Please indulge me for a short policy announcement.

I’m sorry it’s taken me so long to realize that no rational or reasonable response is ever going to come from Bill/George, and that all engagement with him is pointless. I’m now going to start doing what I should have done long ago: Ignore. No more responses to his taunts, his lies, his false accusations, his dual identities, or his wildly colorful stories. From now on, no matter how preposterous Bill/George becomes, he’s getting nothing from me.

]]> By: George https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16292 Sat, 07 Oct 2006 22:46:10 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16292 t meant as a sexual innuendo—" Gee is everything with you about sex?]]> Schoolboy said: “husbands in the room wasn’t meant as a sexual innuendo—”

Gee is everything with you about sex?

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/comment-page-2/#comment-16286 Sat, 07 Oct 2006 12:51:12 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/27/womanhood-priesthood-and-manhood/#comment-16286 Bill/George:

1. Please don’t insult me further, while also insulting the intelligence of everyone who reads this ‘blog, by trying to claim your comment about having husbands in the room wasn’t meant as a sexual innuendo—everyone who can read your comment knows better.

2. Please stop evading and explain how you can possibly know what you claim to know about the way things work in your ward—especially what you claim to know in comment #30.

3. Please show some slight shred of decency by ending your use of “nicknames” such as “schoolboy.” You’re only displaying the puniness of your own intellect.

]]>