Comments on: Sex Education https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:13:37 +0000 hourly 1 By: sean https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-19592 Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:13:37 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-19592 rick said: “Teaching students math, history, sceince, english , reading and writing are the requirements to set goals for students to get into a good college and a good job”

Yes, and teaching kids about sex allows them to complete that college education without an unplanned pregnancy.

…and by the way, I can not recall any portion on the Communist Manifesto that requires Sex Ed.

Actullly Rick, sex education should be taught between the parents and the kids. The state has no rights to interfere on the students academics by imposing there sexual perverted values on others. I never once took sex education in school and even i understand the whole concept of having sex and to be protected. These unprofessional socialist anti-God school board members allow these overpaid school teachers to hand out condoms to innocent 12-13 year old kids like there candy. This is down right sick and down right perverted, which is why we have a higher rate of teen pregnancys in our schools because this kind of teachings is encouraging students to go out and have sex

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-19577 Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:17:11 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-19577 “Teaching students math, history, sceince, english , reading and writing are the requirements to set goals for students to get into a good college and a good job”

Yes, and teaching kids about sex allows them to complete that college education without an unplanned pregnancy.

…and by the way, I can not recall any portion on the Communist Manifesto that requires Sex Ed.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-19568 Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:29:18 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-19568 “people can waite to have sex after marraiges to procreate because thats what sex is meant for.”

I feel sorry for your future wife.

]]>
By: sean https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-19564 Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:25:02 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-19564 rick said: People like you, sean, are the reason we need sex education available in our schools (public and private).

If you are going to make outrageous claims, as you are so prone to do, please be kind enough to cite the studies to which you refer.

Lacking that courtesy, I will assume that you are just making things up to support your argument.”

Actually Rick people can waite to have sex after marraiges to procreate because thats what sex is meant for. These school board members are a bunch of communist sex perverts for dictating to many teachers out there to teach these stuff to our students which is sick. Our schools can abandond God, our schools can abandoned Schools holidays like Xmas, the plegde of allegience and Thanksgiving but not sex education. I find this to be quite hyprocritcle from the secular progressors who have control of our school systems to indoctrinate students the wrong way of thinking that sex comes first before God and the history of this country. Teaching students math, history, sceince, english , reading and writing are the requirements to set goals for students to get into a good college and a good job, not teaching kids about sex and condoms

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-19560 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:42:33 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-19560 He makes things up because he seems to be overly obsessed with sex and with breastfeeding. It’s very strange for someone of his age to be so obsessed with breastfeeding.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-19557 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:09:49 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-19557 People like you, sean, are the reason we need sex education available in our schools (public and private).

If you are going to make outrageous claims, as you are so prone to do, please be kind enough to cite the studies to which you refer.

Lacking that courtesy, I will assume that you are just making things up to support your argument.

]]>
By: sean https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-19552 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:39:09 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-19552 i am 100% against sex education for our schools, sex education needs to be removed from all our public schools because it has a bad affect on students

sex education has a high increase rate on homsexuality, STDS rates and teen promiscuitys in our schools. Sex education has not been proven to work, it undermines the values of an education for students to set goals for the future

]]>
By: George https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-16298 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 01:21:23 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-16298 I see from your posting that you cannot prove the stories you continue to embellish. Why don’t you try telling the truth?

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-16294 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:21:10 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-16294 “George”—even you have admitted that you are Bill. Everyone already knows you are Bill. Please stop this degrading charade.

]]>
By: George https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/comment-page-2/#comment-16290 Sat, 07 Oct 2006 22:39:40 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/09/19/sex-education/#comment-16290 I am really impressed that school boy would go back several months to find something on a closed thread to use.

Try finding something with the name George instead of Bill.

School Boy also said “baseless and vile attacks against my personal character in the previous posting. I say prove your point without making stuff up.

]]>