Comments on: Polling Feature

By: ltbugaf

ltbugaf — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:09:44 +0000

Since it was a poll, not a thread, I didn’t try to bring up any of the nuances you discuss, but simply take it at its most obvious facial meaning.

By: Kim Siever

Kim Siever — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:04:55 +0000

For clarification, one could have partaken of any of those substances without violating the Word of Wisdom. For example, before they joined the church, or because they have never been a member of the church.

By: ltbugaf

ltbugaf — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:00:05 +0000

Ah ha! You added “none of the above.” Thanks.

By: ltbugaf

ltbugaf — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:59:25 +0000

I thought you wanted a reflection of how ALL the visitors to your ‘blog would answer a question. You’re deliberately cutting out those who haven’t violated the Word of Wisdom? I just don’t see the use of that.

By: Kim Siever

Kim Siever — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:44:18 +0000

You don’t. :)

By: ltbugaf

ltbugaf — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:41:00 +0000

Kim, I don’t know what to think of your current poll on the Word of Wisdom. The question is, “Have you ever had something that is prohibited in the Word of Wisdom?” Then the choices are coffee, tea, tobacco, alcohol, drugs, more than one of the above, and the final choice, “Word of Wisdom?” which seems to be for those who haven’t heard of the Word of Wisdom. I don’t seem to be able to vote. I’ve never had coffee, tea, alcohol, or illicit drugs, and I do know what the Word of Wisdom is. How can a person like me cast a vote?