Comments on: Commenting on the Bloggernacle

By: Kim Siever

Kim Siever — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:58:46 +0000

That’s right. We added them because we’re just nice people.

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:57:56 +0000

so the two images at the top right of your blog for “Mormon Archipelago” and “LDSelect.org” were not given to you as a member, but you use them to advertise the “bloggernacle,” right?

By: By Common Consent » The 1% Rule

By Common Consent » The 1% Rule — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:29:09 +0000

[…] I haven’t been around since we emerged from the primordial slime of LDS-Phil, but nearly so. In the past few years I’d say that the 1% rule is being generous at best. Many, many more of us read and skim than comment, and many, many more of us comment than generate content of our own. I’ve wondered in the past why this is so, and others have as well (our own Karen hall has hinted at it in two separate posts, here and here). I’m not convinced that lurking is necessarily a bad thing, nor do I believe that everyone should get their own blogs going (though some should, I guess). The level of activity is an interesting concept, however. Let me throw out a theory, and you tell me whether you agree: the level of participation in the bloggernacle is roughly equivalent to the level of participation in the Church as a whole. […]

By: Kim Siever

Kim Siever — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:27:34 +0000

You get in my starting a blog and posting on LDS topics. If you comment on others’ blogs, eventually, you’ll get linked to and people will start coming to your blog to comment.

There’s no real induction procedure.

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:25:22 +0000

hey, how do you get “in?” I’ve tried emailing this dude, Dave, at ldsblogs.com but never get a response back. LDSelect.org has this form that you fill out that is supposed to send you an email with further instructions but I never get the email……