Comments on: No disciplinary action for disagreeing with the Church https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:48:11 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-27199 Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:48:11 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-27199 Is there any indication that the professor was opposing the Church on one of the political issues? Or was he preaching against the Church on some other important matter? If the latter, comment 3 doesn’t have much of a logical footing.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10963 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:15:11 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10963 lol

like i said, just curious. i have brothers who liked to swear, just to get me agitated. but this was years ago. they are much more mature now, i assume.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10957 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:08:04 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10957 Okay, so Mr. Nielsen is not being re-hired.

I just know that someone, somewhere is going to say,”See, the church didn’t fire him, they just didn’t offer to renew his employment.”

There is no difference whatsoever.

Mr. Nielsen contradicted the church party line, then Mr. Nielsen got canned. So much for free thought.

Oh yeah, and ‘ass’.
Just thought I’d throw that out there for Mary – gotta stay at least as edgey as Steve EM…

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10940 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:38:10 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10940 oh ok.

]]>
By: JM https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10938 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:34:09 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10938 And on the surface, its not really a big deal.

But, I’ve been in wards where for years, the Ward Mission Leader and the full time missionaries are truly “Reactivation Specialists”, even to the point where full time missionaries had home teaching routes with all of the less active members on their list!!!

A good illustration where being a fraction of a degree off course can lead to a completely different direction.

I just feel the longer we let that false doctrine propagate, the worse it will get. Funny how it all starts our so innocently.

]]>
By: Steve EM https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10936 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:24:07 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10936 s every third word, the effect is completely lost and the person just sounds like a moron. That's my two cents.]]> Mary,
First, I probably should have left that three letter word blank. It would have been just as colorful. To your question, I can only answer for myself. For me, colorful language is like seasoning; you sprinkle it for impact and to convey emotion. If it’s every third word, the effect is completely lost and the person just sounds like a moron. That’s my two cents.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10930 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:46:40 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10930 oh, and i am not being critical, i am jsut curious, truly.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10925 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:08:02 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10925 why do some people feel they can’t express their thoughts without swearing?

]]>
By: Steve EM https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10922 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:46:42 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10922 t say when we’d hear your appeal or that we’d abide by any rulings that go against us. The Lord can’t be please with this continued duplicity. Don’t worry I don’t intend to leave or stop tithing just yet. But it’s difficult when our top leaders don’t seem to even try to be honest in their dealings with their fellow man, or impose that standard on the middle management of the church.]]> So sadly Orwellian. “The Church does not extend reprimands or ecclesiastical punishment to persons who choose not to support its views on these issues.” No, we’ll just fire your sorry ass if you happen to work for us!

This reminds me of the appeal procedures for church discipline or termination of employment: Well, we said you can appeal, but we didn’t say when we’d hear your appeal or that we’d abide by any rulings that go against us.

The Lord can’t be please with this continued duplicity.

Don’t worry I don’t intend to leave or stop tithing just yet. But it’s difficult when our top leaders don’t seem to even try to be honest in their dealings with their fellow man, or impose that standard on the middle management of the church.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-10870 Tue, 13 Jun 2006 22:07:56 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/06/13/no-disciplinary-action-for-disagreeing-with-the-church/#comment-10870 Mark,

I entertained the idea of inserting my entire post in the title, but in the long run decided to go with a vaguer title with some content in the post.

]]>