Comments on: Correlation https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Sun, 14 May 2006 18:19:38 +0000 hourly 1 By: nermalcat https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8737 Sun, 14 May 2006 18:19:38 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8737 Yes, Bill I did have a bishop in California that was trying to withold temple recommends for cola drinking, but I believe he (and any other bishops doing this) were reprimanded. It was never official policy.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8580 Thu, 11 May 2006 03:13:10 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8580 ltbugaf is right (wow I agree with him again!)

there have been individuals who have perpetuated it, but it has bever been a church doctrine, just one of those “traditions”.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8579 Thu, 11 May 2006 03:09:27 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8579 Bill, there has never, ever been a time when the doctrine of the Church said you couldn’t hold a temple recommend if you drank colas.

But I do continue to admire the creativity of your memory.

]]>
By: Bill https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8576 Thu, 11 May 2006 02:00:49 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8576 I remember a time when you could not have a Temple Recommend if you drank a cola drink. It went on for many years and was pretty wide spread. Dr. Pepper was not a cola so it was ok to drink. Cola was not available at BYU for years.

Now you can drink a cola drink and have a Temple Recommend. Times change and so does doctrine.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8562 Wed, 10 May 2006 20:06:47 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8562 Oh, things have changed indeed.
Besides, your family was/is fairly liberal compared to many in town anyway.

Think more like Cardston, now.

]]>
By: Nermalcat https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8557 Wed, 10 May 2006 19:17:26 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8557 Aw c’mon Rick. We all drank coke there all the time growing up and nobody cared. Things must have changed a lot since I was there.

Anyhow, I guess it does depend on how you define “core” values or doctrine. As far as I know a little research in scriptures or the prophets wording should settle the issue on such things as tithing, cola drinking etc. Of course there will always be various interpretations due to various personalities or misunderstandings. There are some core concepts that have always been universal in my lifelong observations in the church. The basic teachings of Christian ethics as well as the basic teachings regarding salvation. What get’s catagorized as a “sin” seems to be where there is a lot of division. But once again I think a little honest research would settle most issues. Like John implied, people are left to use their minds and figure out a few things on their own. If everyone really cared about their accountability regarding their opinions and took an honest look at the supporting doctinal evidence, there would probably be a lot more continuity. But free will seems to prevent this ideal.

]]>
By: bill https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8543 Wed, 10 May 2006 02:40:25 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8543 I liked it much better when members were allowed to ask questions they had regarding the gospel. Right or wrong at least you could ask. Super simple answers do not solve lifes questions.

]]>
By: john scherer https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8537 Tue, 09 May 2006 19:35:56 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8537 That too. :P

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8536 Tue, 09 May 2006 19:16:01 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8536 Or rather north-west.

]]>
By: john scherer https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/comment-page-1/#comment-8535 Tue, 09 May 2006 18:48:26 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/05/09/correlation/#comment-8535 Just another reason why I’ll never be moving out west. :)

]]>