Comments on: Big Love https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:05:16 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6812 Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:05:16 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6812 Only if Bill is being tracked by the Neilsen rating service.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6810 Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:48:21 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6810 It made you watch it, and that’s one more viewer to beef up stats.

]]>
By: Bill https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6804 Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:11:45 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6804 I received the email and decided that I should see what the show was before I start sending letters with my name on it. The show I saw did not mention the Church. You could tell it was in Salt Lake since I have been there numerous times. I doubt the show will last very long unless it gets a lot of people sending emails about it. Maybe someone connect with the show started the email?

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6274 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:55:34 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6274 As to first paragraph: I already said it’s not just your viewpoint. The fact that some others share your viewpoint doesn’t mean the writers of these letters should be forced to accept your viewpoint. Those who hold the opposite viewpoint are a pretty impressive bunch, as well.

As to the second paragraph: As a matter of fact, I am pretty cranky today, and I am aware that it’s showing. So I suppose I should apologize.

Sorry.

It’s not about the wrong side of the bed, though. I think it has more to do with a certain cowardly, egotistical, narcissistic, troll I’ve been engaging with on Jeff Lindsay’s Mormanity blog, who formerly identified itself as “Radicalfeministpoet” and is now just operating (quite transparently) as anonymous.

I realize it’s not fair to get pissy with a whole other group of people because of this, so again, let me apologize.

Sorry.

]]>
By: Northerner https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6262 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:51:33 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6262 What makes this so ironic is that we object when others deny us the label “Christian.” And now the tables are turned and some of us seem to want to deny others the label “Mormon.” Sorry, but the fundamentalists as followers of Joseph Smith’s teachings have just as much right to the term as we mainstreamers do!

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6261 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:31:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6261 It’s not just my viewpoint. It’s also the viewpoint of many historians, educators and even some other churches descended from Joseph Smith.

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning, by the way?

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6239 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:07:47 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6239 All you show is that someone else agrees with your broad use. So what? Now we know that some people (including Kim Siever) advocate a broad use of the term “Mormon” and that others (such as the Associated Press and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) advocate a narrow use that prevents confusion. That doesn’t mean the people writing these letters should be forced to adopt your viewpoint rather than that of the AP and the Church.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6230 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:50:11 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6230 Exactly. And that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints doesn’t have a monopoly on the term.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6207 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 03:20:26 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6207 Why should I see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon? So I can see that some people use a broader definition of Mormon, just like you?

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/comment-page-1/#comment-6203 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:42:29 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/29/big-love/#comment-6203 ltbugaf,

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon

]]>