Comments on: Interpretive Beliefs https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:52:28 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402 Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:52:28 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/#comment-5402 Kris, I think there’s a difference between “rejecting the notion that angels have no wings” and just thinking how cool it would be if they did. Seems to me you’re doing the latter. :)

]]>
By: dai https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-5400 Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:16:37 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/#comment-5400 What do you mean by “prophets”? For instance, can one disagree with Bruce R. McConckie assertion that the earth is 6,000 years old and be an active, participating Mormon? That’s how he read the scripture but it’s definitely not hard and fast church doctrine. Prophets have intrepretations just like lay members.

I feel that, as long as we have the proper actions and faith in the right basics, the rest is pretty much NETS (not essential to salvation). Like the great Joseph Smith quote that a man was never damned for believing too much.

]]>
By: Kris https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-5395 Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:47:59 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/#comment-5395 I think angels should have wings…why can’t they just have wings? Even though I reject the notion that angels have no wings am I considered active?

K.

]]>
By: Steve EM https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-5365 Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:14:29 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/#comment-5365 Yes. No.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-5363 Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:08:46 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/#comment-5363 Or perhaps it’s more important to ask whether a person is on the course to Eternal Life, rather than whether the person is an “active, participating Mormon.”

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-5362 Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:04:13 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/16/interpretive-beliefs/#comment-5362 Maybe it’s more important to ask whether the member’s ACTIONS conform with the Prophet’s interpretations.

An example: I disagree with the Prophet about his interpretation of scriptures and believe that engaging in nonintercourse sexual activities with my neighbor’s wife is just fine. So I go ahead and engage in such activities. Can I then be an “active, participating Mormon”? I don’t think so. I would be worthy of excommunication.

Or what if I preach to others that the Prophet’s interpretations are wrong and invite them to join me in turning away from his teachings. Can I be an “active, participating Mormon”? My answer is no–I’m an active, participating apostate instead.

]]>