Comments on: Doing the Opposite

By: ltbugaf

ltbugaf — Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:24:30 +0000

Roland, your point #1 seems to say that the way to measure whether the words of an apostle are important is how many people are talking about them. Is that what you mean? I reminds me of what people would say to me on my mission sometimes: “If God had called a new Prophet, I would have heard about it by now.” My answer was, “You are hearing about. Here we are, God’s messengers, to deliver the message.”

By: Roland

Roland — Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:08:21 +0000

Two reasons why this happen.

1. Most teachers (myself included) have never seen that particular quote from Elder Oaks. If it was really important, I’m sure more people would emphasize it.

2. Most students (myself included) are pretty dumb and we need real life examples to understand the principle being taught. This can then generate the brain cycle and discussion to help us find opportunities to apply the principle in our homes.

A good example are the do’s and dont’s of what to do on Sabbath, and how to calculate that 10%.

By: Kris

Kris — Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:49:37 +0000

Perhaps it is because we do not employ people to teach our classes like other churches? That the teachers could really care less? That they just honestly have never been told that they aren’t supposed to do that? Who knows, BUT if that happens I would feel free to bring tha up in the discussion that ensues!

By: ltbugaf

ltbugaf — Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:05:43 +0000

I can’t say, because that isn’t my experience. The lessons I attend on these topics generally include comments to the same effect as those given by Elder Oaks.