Comments on: I’ll take another cheque now, Ralph https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:33:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4764 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:33:20 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4764 But a 6 is more round than a 1.

So why not the best of both: 6,000

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4762 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:30:07 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4762 Well, 10,000 has more zeroes than 1,000, so, it’s even more of a round number.

]]>
By: Jeff Milner https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4760 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:25:21 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4760 1000 does seem like a more round number than 600.

]]>
By: Kris https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4726 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:50:59 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4726 I just paid off the last of my loans…so how about a $1000.00 annual cheque…YEEHAW!

K.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4717 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:03:45 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4717 Nikki, it sounds like we need to be hiring out of province for these projects … as long as we are paying triple we might as well try to convince more people/businesses to move here.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4716 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:01:07 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4716 …and as long as most of the surplus is from oil and gas revenues, we’d be foolish not to go with the former.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4715 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:12:19 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4715 As long as I live in Alberta, I’ll pick the former. Given that we have no provincial sales tax, the lowest personal income tax, the highest basic and spousal exemptions in the country, the lowest gasoline tax, and the lowest unemployment rate, I believe we already keep more of our money in the first place.

]]>
By: Nikki Workman https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4713 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 04:27:30 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4713 Interesting sidenote on the infrastructure part…as my husband is a general contractor he has a different perspective. He commented that in their goal of infrastructure, they are also creating an inflated market. He figures the government is paying at least double, often triple what these projects are worth. Money well spent?

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4710 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:06:05 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4710 Would most of you prefer (1) a distribution of surplus revenue, or (2) letting the taxpayers keep more of their money in the first place?

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/comment-page-1/#comment-4692 Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:51:30 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/02/28/ill-take-another-cheque-now-ralph/#comment-4692 Oh I agree w/ the student loan thing…

Man, that’s been a monkey on my back for years.

]]>