Comments on: Polyandry https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:43:59 +0000 hourly 1 By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-39346 Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:43:59 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-39346 …not to mention the fact that it is virtually impossible for many poly women to get a divorce given their societal roles. Divorce stats say little about the topic at hand.

“There is no one human being that can fulfill you completely in every physical and mental, emotional way…”

Is that what marriage is supposed to do?

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-39336 Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:52:30 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-39336 Annie, I don’t know that we can look at today’s divorce rate and conclude that its cause is because we have single spouses. Especially when we consider that successful marriages in the Western world also consist of single-spouse marriages.

]]>
By: annie https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-39335 Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:43:57 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-39335 Obviously monogamy isn’t working, just look at the divorce rate. Whether I agree or disagree with the lifestlye really doesn’t matter. But understanding it the key. It may not be because of religion, or child bearing, it can be just as simple as love. I do believe you can love two men at the same time. There is no one human being that can fulfill you completely in every physical and mental, emotional way…its just impossible. We’re too flawed. There’s a lot worse things in life than polygamy. The world needs to focas on more important issues out there, than how many lovers one has.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-36105 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:00:48 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-36105 Emily, when you say Joseph is the author, do you mean that it was entirely of his invention and none of it came from God?

]]>
By: Emily https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-35740 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:13:22 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-35740 Read D&C 132 (joseph’s revelation on Celestial Marriage}.The God I know in my heart would never feel about women the way it is stated. It gave Joseph all the justification he needed to take more and more wives. Was he the author – there is no doubt!

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-3653 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:23:36 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-3653 I hereby award my personal Most Sensible Comment of the Thread Award to Kim, for #24.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-3623 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:27:12 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-3623 Hey Kim, nobody said it was about the *couple* getting money …

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-3622 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:25:59 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-3622 In fact, I lost money by getting married.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-3621 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:25:14 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-3621 huh

our marriage wasn’t about money. neither of us had any when we got married, lol.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/comment-page-2/#comment-3614 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:28:15 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/24/polyandry/#comment-3614 I think it’s fair to argue that marriage has always been about money: dowries – responsibilities – rights

]]>