Comments on: Excommunicated https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:34:17 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-2/#comment-3704 Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:34:17 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3704 Guess I should have said something about the link I posted. It’s an article about the University of Florida extending benefits to unmarried “partners” of employees, but only on the condition that they be in an active sexual relationship.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3684 Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:32:21 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3684 http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060120/LOCAL/201200329/1078/GATORS02

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3679 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:34:25 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3679 I do my best… =)

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3665 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:55:18 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3665 Rick, I thought you could argue with ANYTHING! ;)

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3643 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:27:36 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3643 I certainly can’t argue with that.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3633 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:02:53 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3633 It’s no more Orwellian than the NAACP kicking out one of its members for advocating the reinstitution of Jim Crow laws.

]]>
By: rick https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3612 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:23:44 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3612 There’s something definitely Orwellian about the phrase, “public defiance of the Prophet”.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3606 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:02:40 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3606 Kim, one of the sinful practices they would need to abstain from is apostasy in the form of public defiance of the Prophet, which they would be doing by being married to a member of the same sex.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3604 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:58:57 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3604 “They can choose not to engage in sinful practices and remain faithful Latter-day Saints.”

Being a faithful Latter-day Saint is not the same as participating fully. That being said, even if there actions were exemplary, the fact of the matter is, that married homosexual couples cannot participate fully in the church. Regardless of whether they have sex or not.

I guarantee you that if two men married each other but never had any sexual relations, their participation in church activity would be very limited.

]]>
By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/comment-page-1/#comment-3599 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:45:08 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/15/excommunicated/#comment-3599 I agree that it has nothing to do with being in or out of marriage. Homosexual sex is sinful whether in or out of marriage. Defiance of the Prophet is sinful whether on the topic of same-sex marriage or something else.

I disagree that homosexuals cannot participate fully in the Church. They can. They can choose not to engage in sinful practices and remain faithful Latter-day Saints.

]]>