Comments on: Employment Compromises? https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:47:32 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/comment-page-1/#comment-4108 Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:47:32 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/#comment-4108 I once had an opportunity to audition, as an actor, for a commercial promoting the Colorado lottery. I turned down the audition. I was motivated partly by a disapproval of gambling but more by a sense of not wanting to be seen as a public promoter of gambling.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/comment-page-1/#comment-3050 Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:53:26 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/#comment-3050 Duncan,

You my be interested in an old post on off-limit careers for Mormons.

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/comment-page-1/#comment-3043 Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:20:10 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/#comment-3043 A local movie theatre owner, who is also a member, was quoted in the local paper this morning as saying that he doesn’t play the censor. He lets people be their own censors.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/comment-page-1/#comment-3042 Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:04:06 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/07/employment-conflicts-with-gospel/#comment-3042 hi duncan! welcome.

hmmm, not really sure, i suppose it depends. for example i couldn’t work in a field where i am actively promoting something that could hurt someone else, but then i worked at tim horton’s years and years ago selling coffee of course and at gas stations selling cigarettes.

also i bought a 50/50 ticket at a union christmas party once. right in front of the bishop. the money was for a good cause which was why i did it. actually the bishop had bought one too…. was this wrong??

]]>