Comments on: Sore Knees https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:07:27 +0000 hourly 1 By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3584 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:07:27 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3584 By the way, what reply does Kim give if we’re “just curious” about what HE believes?

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3581 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:01:47 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3581 If saying that this is no one’s business except the individual with sore knees were “jumping on him,” I guess you’d be right.

]]> By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3566 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:42:38 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3566 you jumped on him for asking in the first place. he wasn’t asking for validation, just opinions. kim is always curious about what other’s think, doesn’t mean he agrees OR disagree. just curious.

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3564 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:40:29 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3564 I don’t think what I said above was an attack. I said that this decision belongs to the person with sore knees and is no one else’s business. I still say so.

]]> By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3559 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:35:11 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3559 Yes, but then why attack him?

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3557 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:33:41 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3557 If he wants to know what I think, then I’ve given him what he wants.

]]> By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3552 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:56:11 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3552 ltbugaf

What’s wrong with asking folk’s opinions?

Remember the title of this blog is “Our thoughts”. He has a thought and writes it out.

Why do you always have to find something negative to say about his comments or questions? Good grief.

Also, he was just curious. Doesn’t change his own thoughts on the matter, just wants to see what other’s think about it.

]]> By: ltbugaf https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3549 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:37:42 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3549 My position is that if the sore knees belong to Kim, he should judge the matter on his own. I have no right to judge it. Soliciting our opinions about this isn’t a good idea, in my view. (But of course, there I’m sharing an opinion…hmm…this could go on all day…)

]]> By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3546 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:14:17 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3546 oh and besides that he wasn’t MAKING a judgement. He was asking a question and not taking sides. The reason (why do I have to keep repeating this? It’s like teaching my children a new concept) is he likes to know OTHERS opinions to create thought (well actually he likes to create discussion). ltbugaf, you seem to think that everything Kim writes is his on unadulterated opinion. I have explained this before. He likes to provoke thought and discussion. That’s it. And on this topic he is not even STATING an opinion. He wanted to see what other individuals think. That’s all. Yeesh.

]]> By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/comment-page-1/#comment-3545 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:04:26 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/01/05/sore-knees/#comment-3545 Because it is his business. He is the one with sore knees. Kim has arthritis.

]]>