Comments on: Under assignment from the stake https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2005/03/06/under-assignment-from-the-stake/ Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues. Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:21:32 +0000 hourly 1 By: Stephen https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2005/03/06/under-assignment-from-the-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-456 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=88#comment-456 Good point. Sometimes you can give good advice but people just don’t want to hear it and will avoid the truth.

What use is it to share the gospel or tell the truth if some people will avoid it?

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2005/03/06/under-assignment-from-the-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-457 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=88#comment-457 Whether or not it was good advice do you think it was really your place to give it?

If it had have been a stay-at-home wife instead of husband would you have still talked to her about it? Do you think they would have given you the same cold-shoulder treatment if that had been the case?

]]>
By: Kim Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2005/03/06/under-assignment-from-the-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-458 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=88#comment-458 “do you think it was really your place to give it”

The stake president seemed to think so.

“If it had have been a stay-at-home wife instead of husband would you have still talked to her about it?”

I doubt it. There were hundreds of “stay-at-home wives” in our ward and the stake president never asked me to visit any of them in the same capacity.

]]>
By: Mary Siever https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2005/03/06/under-assignment-from-the-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-459 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=88#comment-459 Kim was under assignment. His opinion wasn’t asked about approaching the family. As EQ president. Did he want to? Not really. Did I want him too? Not at all. They held it against him and his councillor (probably still do) for a very long time. And personally, it made no difference to him (Kim) what their situation was. But his duty was to do what the SP asked him to do.

Oh, and you can leave your name, anonymous. Kim doesn’t care if you criticise him :)

]]>
By: Jerilyn https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2005/03/06/under-assignment-from-the-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-460 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=88#comment-460 Having been the working partner in a marriage while my husband is off and on the house husband, I can say that there are sometimes reasons for our arrangement beyond what other people realize. In our case, my husband has, over the last 12 years or so, become increasingly mentally ill. (I did not mean that as a joke. For a change.) His capacity to hold a job that can support our family is less and less every year.

However. If someone came to our home to tell him to get a job so his wife wouldn’t have to work, we would probably be honest about the situation.

That said, we also know many many people that think because they have a college degree or have held important jobs in the past, that they are above doing certain kinds of work. Luckily, my husband has never felt that way. (He has a master’s degree in Psychology and currently drives a forklift.)

Anyway, to answer your question, I think it’s always best to do what we’ve been asked to do by those who are in authority, regardless of the outcome. Personally, I cannot tell you the number of times I have been called to repentance by someone, causing me to get huffy and upset, only later to realize that if I’d truly listened and been repentant that I could have saved myself a great deal of heartache. Perhaps the next time this man has a similar situation to the one you were involved in, he will behave differently.

Then again, what do I know? I’m married to a loon, which makes me mostly loony myself.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.ourthoughts.ca/2005/03/06/under-assignment-from-the-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-461 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.ourthoughts.ca/?p=88#comment-461 Sounds like another case of killing the messenger.

Danithew

]]>